Quick Comparison
Unified Status System
Both protocols use the same status field with consistent values.Status Handling (Both Protocols)
Every response includes a status field that tells you exactly what to do:
See Task Lifecycle for complete status handling guide.
Transport Format Differences
Same status and data, different packaging:MCP Response Format
A2A Response Format
Async Operation Differences
Both protocols carry the same AdCP status progression:submitted → working → completed/failed
The progression above is AdCP application state. MCP Tasks and A2A task state are transport mechanics that can deliver an AdCP payload, but they are not a replacement for AdCP task polling or reconciliation.
MCP Task-Augmented Call (Transport Wrapper)
A2A Async Pattern
Context Management
MCP: Manual Context
A2A: Automatic Context
Clarification Handling
Both protocols use the samestatus: "input-required" pattern:
Error Handling
Both usestatus: "failed" with same error structure:
Choosing a Protocol
Choose MCP if you’re using:
- Claude Desktop or Claude Code
- MCP-compatible AI assistants
- Simple tool-based integrations
- Direct JSON responses
Choose A2A if you’re using:
- Google AI agents or Agent Engine
- Multi-modal workflows (text + files)
- Real-time streaming updates
- Artifact-based data handling
Both protocols provide:
- Same AdCP tasks and capabilities
- Unified status system for clear client logic
- Context management for conversations
- Async operation support
- Human-in-the-loop workflows
- Error handling and recovery